-= Frank Black Forum =-
-= Frank Black Forum =-
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Off Topic!
 General Chat
 Boondock Saints sequel
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

TarTar
* Dog in the Sand *

1965 Posts

Posted - 04/29/2004 :  05:21:17  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
There's supposed to be a sequel sometime this year to the very underappreciated visceral cinema experience known as Boondocks Saints. I'm not sure how I feel about this. Don't get me wrong, I loved the first Boondock Saints, but does it need to be repeated/extended? I mean, how many times can those guys be vigilantes and keep it interesting? Well, I guess they kept the pace and interest going through all of the first one, but I just don't know if the film needs a sequel. I suppose I should just wait, though, cuz I'll probably end up loving the film and have to act like I never questioned the validity of a sequel. I am anticipating it, and will definitely see it in theatres. Why the hell am I bitching about something as awesome as Boondock Saints being continued? Perhaps I just fear that if the sequel doesn't hold up to the first film, if it's a complete disgrace to the Boondock Saints name, then it will taint the first film. Anyone know when it's supposed to be released?

"(insert clever quote here)"

soundofataris
= Cult of Ray =

USA
715 Posts

Posted - 04/29/2004 :  07:08:29  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm one of the few people who absolutely hated the first movie. Everything about about it was bad: the plot, actors, dialouge, twists. Its such a stinker in my book that I am totally shocked and awed by the love the movie gets. Fans have tried to explain it to me, and I hae rewatched it, but still, I think its trash.

Some like wine and some like hops but what I really love is my scotch
Go to Top of Page

shineoftheever
> Teenager of the Year <

Canada
4307 Posts

Posted - 04/29/2004 :  12:38:25  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I remember I liked the first one , but i forget how it ended. Willem Defoe is always great, IMO.

Why is 'monosyllabic' such a long word?

Edited by - shineoftheever on 04/29/2004 15:38:11
Go to Top of Page

klikger
= Cult of Ray =

693 Posts

Posted - 04/29/2004 :  13:31:56  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Willem Dafoe IS always good, but I loved the brothers in the first movie. I assume that it'll be a good sequel, because its not like they were under pressure to cash in on a sequel since the first one didn't make much money.
Go to Top of Page

benji
> Teenager of the Year <

New Zealand
3426 Posts

Posted - 04/30/2004 :  05:28:27  Show Profile  Visit benji's Homepage  Reply with Quote
i thought the boondock saints was an awesome movie...one of my alltime favs...cannae wait for a sequal.


"I joined the Cult of Frank / I think that man deserves a DB!"
Go to Top of Page

TarTar
* Dog in the Sand *

1965 Posts

Posted - 07/04/2004 :  12:06:59  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm a bit disappointed to not see Willem Dafoe's name on the project (now entitled Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day). I guess that doesn't mean he's not going to be in it. I hope he is. Unless of course the story just doesn't need him. It's good to see Clifton Collins, Jr. is going to be in it. He's played a number of roles that I thought showed great promise for larger roles. I believe he's the grandson of Pedro Gonzalez-Gonzalez.

"There is a new craze in the nation/ it is lamination/ we like to laminate/ we laminate our driver's license/ so cannot be changed"

Edited by - TarTar on 07/04/2004 12:07:28
Go to Top of Page

cvanepps
= Cult of Ray =

USA
442 Posts

Posted - 07/04/2004 :  22:32:26  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I thought Boondock Saints was a self-important Tarantino wanna-be. It lacked all of the wit but none of the conviction of the recent crop of indie films (American Splendor, Ghost World, May). For you thinkheads out there in droves...I'm not trying to compare Boondock Saints with American Splendor or Ghost World or May on a plot, style, or genre basis. What I'm saying is that the wit and originality that those films had was such that the makers of Boondock Saints could not provide in their moistest of dreams.

TarTar, to answer your question, "does it need to be repeated/extended?" No, it doesn't. It barely needed the first try.

-= It's not easy to kidnap a fat man =-
http://www.cvanepps.com
Go to Top of Page

TarTar
* Dog in the Sand *

1965 Posts

Posted - 07/04/2004 :  22:48:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I won't deny that the film is, more than anything, an excercise in style, but damn, it was a good work out for me.

"There is a new craze in the nation/ it is lamination/ we like to laminate/ we laminate our driver's license/ so cannot be changed"
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
-= Frank Black Forum =- © 2002-2020 Frank Black Fans, Inc. Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000