-= Frank Black Forum =-
-= Frank Black Forum =-
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Off Topic!
 General Chat
 ASHES 2nd Test
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

1965
= Cult of Ray =

Australia
799 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  01:37:15  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
AUSTRALIA 513 & 4/168 beat ENGLAND 6/551 dec. & 129 (by six wickets).

How did the Poms lose that one!? Back to the drawing board again...

(( I'm a Snake... ))

pixiestu
> Teenager of the Year <

United Kingdom
2564 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  02:24:33  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
This is depressing.

"The arc of triumph"
Go to Top of Page

Llamadance
> Teenager of the Year <

United Kingdom
2543 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  03:06:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm quite enjoying it actually ;)


Scratching the surface without a purpose won't accomplish anything new

Upload your Frank photos here - fb.net gallery

Go to Top of Page

Homers_pet_monkey
= Official forum monkey =

United Kingdom
17125 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  04:50:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Nobody expected us to win that one did they?


I'd walk her everyday, into a shady place
Go to Top of Page

1965
= Cult of Ray =

Australia
799 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  06:06:41  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Homers_pet_monkey

Nobody expected us to win that one did they?


I'd walk her everyday, into a shady place



No not reallly.. But Plan-A for England would've been a Draw as the worst case scenario.

By batting so slowly, England were keeping Australia in the game and setting themselves up to take a fall.

(( I'm a Snake... ))
Go to Top of Page

vilainde
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Niue
7443 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  06:18:00  Show Profile  Visit vilainde's Homepage  Reply with Quote
A sport where scores are 513 & 4/168 vs 6/551 dec. & 129 (by six wickets)? Sounds like Calvinball to me.




Denis

Go to Top of Page

benji
> Teenager of the Year <

New Zealand
3426 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  11:00:36  Show Profile  Visit benji's Homepage  Reply with Quote
i can't believe that the english lost that test match.
australia are very good, but surely the english aren't this bad?!?!!!

well, thats the end of the series. 5-0 it will undoubtedly be.



all i can say, thank god for polio! brian
Go to Top of Page

1965
= Cult of Ray =

Australia
799 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  14:59:42  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by vilainde

A sport where scores are 513 & 4/168 vs 6/551 dec. & 129 (by six wickets)? Sounds like Calvinball to me.




Denis




Simplified Score: AUSTRALIA 681 v ENGLAND 680.

(( I'm a Snake... ))
Go to Top of Page

Cult_Of_Frank
= Black Noise Maker =

Canada
11687 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  15:43:32  Show Profile  Visit Cult_Of_Frank's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Can someone explain the score to those of us with a morbid curiosity?


"Now you're officially my woman. Kudos. I can't say I don't envy you."
Go to Top of Page

Steak n Sabre
* Dog in the Sand *

Uzbekistan
1013 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  16:20:45  Show Profile  Visit Steak n Sabre's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Whose ashes are in that little jug anyway??


Do You Believe It? .... You Better..

Edited by - Steak n Sabre on 12/05/2006 16:21:21
Go to Top of Page

Don Eduardo
= Cult of Ray =

Australia
403 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  19:51:39  Show Profile  Click to see Don Eduardo's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
Ok COF - England batted first and scored 6/551 dec.....which means they didnt use their whole 10 wickets (like "outs" in baseball i guess), they decided they had enough runs after losing six wickets ad "declared" their innings finished. Then Australia lost their 10 wickets for 513, 38 less than England. Then England had their 2nd innings and lost their 10 wickets for only 129 runs, giving them a lead of 167 runs. So Australia needed 168 to win, which they achieved, only losing 4 wickets (4/168). so Australia won by six wickets (number they had remaining in hand)

That probably made no sense whatsoever.

Go to Top of Page

Cult_Of_Frank
= Black Noise Maker =

Canada
11687 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  20:16:09  Show Profile  Visit Cult_Of_Frank's Homepage  Reply with Quote
It started okay, actually... but then I realized I don't especially know the rules, which does namke it more difficult to follow. :)

Still I appreciate it.


"Now you're officially my woman. Kudos. I can't say I don't envy you."
Go to Top of Page

Crispy Water
= Cult of Ray =

Canada
819 Posts

Posted - 12/05/2006 :  23:05:12  Show Profile  Visit Crispy Water's Homepage  Reply with Quote
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/hosking/cricket/explanation.htm

I was thinking long about joining a local club this year...not sure it will ever happen.

Nothing is ever something.
Go to Top of Page

Homers_pet_monkey
= Official forum monkey =

United Kingdom
17125 Posts

Posted - 12/06/2006 :  04:39:49  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Steak n Sabre

Whose ashes are in that little jug anyway??


Do You Believe It? .... You Better..



The entire England squad if they don't pull their fingers out.


I'd walk her everyday, into a shady place
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
-= Frank Black Forum =- © 2002-2020 Frank Black Fans, Inc. Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000