|
The King Of Karaoke
> Teenager of the Year <
USA
3759 Posts |
 Posted - 08/05/2007 : 14:03:28
|
Conspiracy theorists say World Trade Center 7 is the best proof for controlled demolition because it wasn't hit by airliners and only had a few fires. They also claim that there was a confession from the building owner who said he "pulled" it. But this is deceptive because while building 7 wasn't hit by an airliner, it was hit by the large perimeter columns of the Tower collapse. It was 400 ft away but the towers were more than 1300 ft tall. As the tower peeled open, it easily tilted over to reach building 7. Below is evidence showing that conspiracy theorists are wrong.
Okay, in this first paragraph they leave a whole lot of things out. This is the same tactic used in the Popular Mechanics piece. First off, there were bombs in the buildings. Period. The center column is blown out and the building collapses in seven seconds into a fairly neat pile in it's own basement. That is what happened. Demolition teams work very hard to make sure that happens. That doesn't just happen on it own. Yes, it was hit by debris from the towers. So were all the other buildings surrounding the towers. Most much more severely than WTC7. But, only WTC7 fell (in seven seconds into it's own footprint just like in demolition). Why? Because it was also leased by Larry Silverstien (from David Rockefellor) and had a big fat terrorist attack insurance policy on it. The other buildings were not leased by Silverstein and did not have the insurance policy. If they had been I'm sure they would have fallen too. Another thing is that all of the towers that fell had pools of molten metal in their basements that burned at over 1500 degrees for weeks afterward. That is caused by Thermite but more specifcally in this case "Thermate." Thermate is a patented form of thermite that (I believe only) demolition companies use. This has been conclusively proven via electron microscope by fromer BYU physicist Dr Stephen Jones. Again people i invite you to do a little homework on this. Here's a bried video that will show you what a crock this website is: WTCV7: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2073592843640256739&q=WTC7%3A+The+Smoking+Gun+of+9%2F11 Dr Stephen Jones' paper: http://www.google.com/search?tab=nw&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&ned=us&q=dr%20stephen%20jones%20paper 911 Mysteries: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7627261092341180270&q=911mysteries&pr=goog-sl
As you can see from the graphic below, all the buildings just as far away from both towers as WTC7 were hit. The others were either very short buildings which didn't have to support a massive load above or had no fire. Only Building 7 had unfought fires and the massive load of 40 stories above them.
This is ridiculous. I'm not sure why I'm even bothering with this drivel. At no time in history before or since has a steel building collpased do to fire. The only one that have have been on september 11 and were leased by Larry Silverstein. The towers were an asbestous nightmare coating billions to rty to clean and were also considered an eyesore their tenancy was at something like 57 percent and they were extremely expensive to operate. They had to pump oxygen into them for one thing. They accomplished two things on that day; they demolished some ugly, old asbestos ridden buidlings to make way for a new WTC and second they scared the hell out of the workld and started this fake war on terror which is really a plan for global domination
Dallas, I'm disappointed in you. You link this simpleton bullshit which reveals to me that you've obviously not looked at a single link I've provided. Read Dr. Jones paper(linked above). Explain to me the thermate/pools of molten metal in the basement of WTC7(no plane) and the others. Eplain to me the bombs and please don't say the generators in the basement. What do planes 80 plus stories up have to do with diesel generators in the basement. I've seen people throw lit cigarrettes into puddles of diesel and they go out. Why was WTC 7 not even mentioned in the the commision report? No seriously why? If this ding-a-ling with a website has all the answers how come they could not be bothered? Explain to me what you people are so afraid of. Any of you doubting this please explain to me why you refuse to look at any of the evidence but continue waste days arguing with me over this. It's exactly like the flat earht theory. hjere I am telling you it's round and why but all of you are too ingrained in flat earth theiry to bother even looking at the evidence. All this site does is hand pick a few things amke it seem like that's all we have to go on and then try to lamely debunk them. You are being lied to people!
I'm looking through the rest here. There is a first responder speaking of "white smoke" Hello? Thermite causes white smoke. I'll debunk more of this later.
------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRZmzf7WiNg |
 |
|
7-11 is an inside job
