-= Frank Black Forum =-
-= Frank Black Forum =-
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Off Topic!
 General Chat
 Miami Vice Remake
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

glacial906
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1738 Posts

Posted - 07/08/2006 :  20:16:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
For some reason, I am really looking forward to seeing this movie. On the surface it looks like another typical action flick, and I'm certain it will have an overabundance of fast car chases, loose women and drug cartels. But, it has one thing going for it: it's director. I love Michael Mann. My favorite of his movies by far has got to be "Heat." If he can bring in any of the drama and emotion of that movie to "Miami Vice" it will be good. From the looks of it we will see Sonny sexing it up with the ladies, and Tubbs has some one-liners in the trailers. But, fortunately the movie doesn't look to be simply a parody of the original show, like "Starsky & Hutch" and "Dukes of Hazzard."

Any thoughts?

Incidentally, Michael Mann was the executive producer of the "Miami Vice" television series from '85-'89.


Signature censored by forum moderators.

jimmy
= Cult of Ray =

USA
876 Posts

Posted - 07/08/2006 :  23:25:32  Show Profile  Visit jimmy's Homepage  Reply with Quote


I can't think of anything he's directed besides "Manhunter", and I didn't see all of that but, except for some parts that seem dated now, it had a good style and semed pretty well-made.
Go to Top of Page

Carl
- A 'Fifth' Catholic -

Ireland
11546 Posts

Posted - 07/09/2006 :  10:00:13  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Mann has directed a lot of good movies...Heat, The Insider, Collateral. I wasn't too interested in this until I realised he was actually directing.


Join the Cult Of Pob! And don't forget to listen to the Pobcast!
Go to Top of Page

tobafett
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1713 Posts

Posted - 07/09/2006 :  10:51:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I've not seen the trailer yet...are they wearing pink tee shirts and suits with sneakers with no socks?
Go to Top of Page

glacial906
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1738 Posts

Posted - 07/09/2006 :  11:37:12  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
jimmy: He directed "Ali," "Last of the Mohicans" and "the Insider" to name a few.

Carl: Yeah, that's my take on it, too.

tobafett: Nah, it's got Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx as Crockett and Tubbs, and it's not set in the 80's, it takes place today...I think they've just taken the cool ideas from the original show and incorporated them into the movie. Hopefully no sneakers sans socks and pink t-shirts. And, hopefully, no Don Johnson music either! (i.e. "Heartbeat...)


Signature censored by forum moderators.
Go to Top of Page

HeywoodJablome
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1485 Posts

Posted - 07/09/2006 :  15:19:50  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by tobafett

I've not seen the trailer yet...are they wearing pink tee shirts and suits with sneakers with no socks?



One can only hope, my good man.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Wait a minute, strike that. Reverse it.
Go to Top of Page

tobafett
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1713 Posts

Posted - 07/09/2006 :  19:12:29  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
hey, that show is the reason I keep a white sport coat and checkerboard Vans sneakers in my closet...
Go to Top of Page

vilainde
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Niue
7443 Posts

Posted - 07/10/2006 :  00:20:11  Show Profile  Visit vilainde's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Yep, same as everyone. Michael Mann is cool (haven't seen Ali though)


Denis

Go to Top of Page

TRANSMARINE
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
2002 Posts

Posted - 07/10/2006 :  08:23:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I am a fan of this show...we used to actually stay home Friday night's to watch this in high school. Why the FUCK did Mann remake his own show, and not have it set in the 80's?! It makes no sense, and Colin Farrel is the worst fucking actor. Fuck this movie.

Hank the 8th was a duplicated man

-bRIAN
Go to Top of Page

floop
= Wannabe Volunteer =

Mexico
15297 Posts

Posted - 07/10/2006 :  09:11:58  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
the marketing for this film is horrible. i can see how a MIAMI VICE movie might actually be cool, but the ads are making me not want to see it.




"I don't have any money to buy new clothes and if they paid me to get some I'd probably buy more hoodies." - Mark Wainfur
Go to Top of Page

TRANSMARINE
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
2002 Posts

Posted - 07/10/2006 :  09:52:58  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by floop

the marketing for this film is horrible. i can see how a MIAMI VICE movie might actually be cool, but the ads are making me not want to see it.




"I don't have any money to buy new clothes and if they paid me to get some I'd probably buy more hoodies." - Mark Wainfur




Agreed. Even the trailers aren't interesting.

Hank the 8th was a duplicated man

-bRIAN
Go to Top of Page

Carl
- A 'Fifth' Catholic -

Ireland
11546 Posts

Posted - 07/10/2006 :  11:13:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Having checked out the teaser and main trailer, I'd guess it'll be either sort-of okay in a crappy way, or pretty good for what it is. It really has that typical Michael Mann look!!


Join the Cult Of Pob! And don't forget to listen to the Pobcast!
Go to Top of Page

vilainde
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Niue
7443 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  01:41:54  Show Profile  Visit vilainde's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Who does the trailers for movies? When I'm interested in a movie I always take care of avoiding the trailers for it. My fave movie of 2006 (The New World) had the worst trailer ever.


Denis

Go to Top of Page

floop
= Wannabe Volunteer =

Mexico
15297 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  06:59:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
trailers are almost always done by outside companies that have nothing to do with the movie at all. the marketing department, and people working at the trailer houses are the ones who make the trailers. the writer, producer, directors usually have no control how the trailer will look, no matter how bad they might be.

sometimes they're good though




"I don't have any money to buy new clothes and if they paid me to get some I'd probably buy more hoodies." - Mark Wainfur
Go to Top of Page

Homers_pet_monkey
= Official forum monkey =

United Kingdom
17125 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  10:41:35  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I hope this doesn't just end up like a Bad Boys 3.


I'd walk her everyday, into a shady place
Go to Top of Page

glacial906
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1738 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  12:14:41  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Yeah, I was able to look past the bullshit hype that exuded from the trailer to this film, what with the Jay-Z/Linkin Park song and all, because of Michael Mann's involvement. I wonder what songs the trailer for "Heat" used?


Signature censored by forum moderators.
Go to Top of Page

TRANSMARINE
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
2002 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  13:37:46  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by glacial906

Yeah, I was able to look past the bullshit hype that exuded from the trailer to this film, what with the Jay-Z/Linkin Park song and all, because of Michael Mann's involvement. I wonder what songs the trailer for "Heat" used?


Signature censored by forum moderators.



HEAT trailers used the Moby version of God Moving Over The Face Of The Waters.

I just feel why remake something and reinvent it entirely? That's Oliver Stone territory...not Michael Mann. It's like Michael Mann himself turning HEAT into a TV series ten years from now, and having it take place in 2016. It's just...wrong. CRIME STORY (another Mann helmed tv vehicle) ultimately failed because it tried to put the 80's in the 60's.

MIAMI VICE belongs in the 80's. Even when it was current, it never hesitated to be aware that it belonged NOWHERE else than in the 80's.

Eww! It calls to mind I SPY! What a cool show...grew up on it. Why the heck did they even TRY to resurrect it?

MIAMI VICE is better on the small screen, etched now into DVD, with none other than Don Johnson, Philip Michael Thomas, and a shitload of pastel colored blazers. And no socks.

Hank the 8th was a duplicated man

-bRIAN
Go to Top of Page

Homers_pet_monkey
= Official forum monkey =

United Kingdom
17125 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  14:22:36  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by glacial906

Yeah, I was able to look past the bullshit hype that exuded from the trailer to this film, what with the Jay-Z/Linkin Park song and all, because of Michael Mann's involvement. I wonder what songs the trailer for "Heat" used?


Signature censored by forum moderators.



Yeah I heard that shite music before on the trailer. Not a good sign.


I'd walk her everyday, into a shady place
Go to Top of Page

glacial906
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1738 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  16:26:57  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSMARINE

I just feel why remake something and reinvent it entirely? That's Oliver Stone territory...not Michael Mann. It's like Michael Mann himself turning HEAT into a TV series ten years from now, and having it take place in 2016. It's just...wrong. CRIME STORY (another Mann helmed tv vehicle) ultimately failed because it tried to put the 80's in the 60's.



"Heat" was a remake of "L.A. Takedown," a made-for-tv movie also penned and directed by Mann in the '80's.



Signature censored by forum moderators.
Go to Top of Page

TRANSMARINE
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
2002 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  16:48:43  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by glacial906

quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSMARINE

I just feel why remake something and reinvent it entirely? That's Oliver Stone territory...not Michael Mann. It's like Michael Mann himself turning HEAT into a TV series ten years from now, and having it take place in 2016. It's just...wrong. CRIME STORY (another Mann helmed tv vehicle) ultimately failed because it tried to put the 80's in the 60's.



"Heat" was a remake of "L.A. Takedown," a made-for-tv movie also penned and directed by Mann in the '80's.



Signature censored by forum moderators.



Hmmm...true.

But it is far from remembered. And there was nothing remotely familiar in mass audience minds of L.A. Takedown to even link the two together other than perhaps side-note mentions in reviews. And a 90 minute unrecalled tv movie turned big budget film as opposed to a groundbreaking 6 year tv series turned film is the sickness I have over it. There obviously was points in L.A. Takedown which stuck with Mann...ideas not satisfied...thus the fully realized treatment of HEAT. So is Miami Vice the Series now something Mann has realized he was not satisfied with, and is going to re-realize it for a movie screen?

Don't get me wrong...I like Michael Mann and have for a long time...the INSIDER is a magnificent film. MANHUNTER is worlds better than SILENCE OF THE LAMBS (Brian Cox is much creepier than Hopkins). Blah blah blah. But this MIAMI VICE is like Orson Welles remaking his CITIZEN KANE. Why? Why? Why?

The whole thing is just messy.

And the worse thing is that I KNOW I'll be there opening night. Go figure.

Hank the 8th was a duplicated man

-bRIAN
Go to Top of Page

Carl
- A 'Fifth' Catholic -

Ireland
11546 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  17:24:01  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by TRANSMARINE

MIAMI VICE belongs in the 80's. Even when it was current, it never hesitated to be aware that it belonged NOWHERE else than in the 80's.


It's kind of disappointing that the movie isn't set in that period.


Join the Cult Of Pob! And don't forget to listen to the Pobcast!
Go to Top of Page

TRANSMARINE
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
2002 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  17:28:36  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Carl

quote:
Originally posted by TRANSMARINE

MIAMI VICE belongs in the 80's. Even when it was current, it never hesitated to be aware that it belonged NOWHERE else than in the 80's.


It's kind of disappointing that the movie isn't set in that period.


Join the Cult Of Pob! And don't forget to listen to the Pobcast!



That's my whole point.

Hank the 8th was a duplicated man

-bRIAN
Go to Top of Page

floop
= Wannabe Volunteer =

Mexico
15297 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  17:35:43  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
i think you guys all bring up valid arguments, but the thing that bothers me the most is that it's not set in the 80's




"I don't have any money to buy new clothes and if they paid me to get some I'd probably buy more hoodies." - Mark Wainfur
Go to Top of Page

Carl
- A 'Fifth' Catholic -

Ireland
11546 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  17:37:29  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Yes, I agree. And also, it's not set between 1979-1990.




Join the Cult Of Pob! And don't forget to listen to the Pobcast!
Go to Top of Page

tobafett
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1713 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  22:41:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
i'm concerned about the socks. i bet these new boys are wearing socks.
supposed to look like this fellas:



and add concern that it's not set in the era of ms. pac-man, my pet monster, and new coke.

Edited by - tobafett on 07/11/2006 22:44:27
Go to Top of Page

glacial906
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1738 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  23:02:05  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by TRANSMARINE

MIAMI VICE belongs in the 80's. Even when it was current, it never hesitated to be aware that it belonged NOWHERE else than in the 80's.


That's crazy. Funny, but crazy. As though Miami Vice were some kind of clairvoyant, sentient entity that knew that one day it would be out-of-date...beloved to some, yes, and watched by many in syndication, but ultimately without a place in the new millenium


Signature censored by forum moderators.
Go to Top of Page

glacial906
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1738 Posts

Posted - 07/11/2006 :  23:02:39  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by TRANSMARINE

MIAMI VICE belongs in the 80's. Even when it was current, it never hesitated to be aware that it belonged NOWHERE else than in the 80's.


That's crazy. Funny, but crazy. As though Miami Vice were some kind of clairvoyant, sentient entity that knew that one day it would be out-of-date...beloved to some, yes, and watched by many in syndication, but ultimately without a place in the new millenium


Signature censored by forum moderators.
Go to Top of Page

TRANSMARINE
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
2002 Posts

Posted - 07/12/2006 :  08:29:46  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Well, just look at it! How many other shows really really reflect the moment they existed in, while simultaneously attempting to do just that? The show was all style, fashion, looks, sound, and shock (with an undercurrent of rehashed 70's tv cop plot-lines, which didn't really matter, and mostly they made no sense). Each week it would strive to hit us over the head with the fact this was the 1980's.

Hank the 8th was a duplicated man

-bRIAN
Go to Top of Page

Carl
- A 'Fifth' Catholic -

Ireland
11546 Posts

Posted - 07/12/2006 :  08:38:57  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
This was always on in my house as a child, the opening credits with the kind-of mardi gras parade and speedboats and thumping music always sticks in the brain! There was an episode called Home invaders, I think, that started with an elderly couple waking up in the middle of the night to find two masked thugs robbing them, that scared the shit out of me. I had that, Close Encounters and Whitley Strieber's Communion aliens to thank for many a sleepless night as a little 'un!! ;D


Join the Cult Of Pob! And don't forget to listen to the Pobcast!

Edited by - Carl on 07/12/2006 08:39:24
Go to Top of Page

glacial906
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1738 Posts

Posted - 07/12/2006 :  17:12:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by TRANSMARINE

Well, just look at it! How many other shows really really reflect the moment they existed in, while simultaneously attempting to do just that? The show was all style, fashion, looks, sound, and shock (with an undercurrent of rehashed 70's tv cop plot-lines, which didn't really matter, and mostly they made no sense). Each week it would strive to hit us over the head with the fact this was the 1980's.

Hank the 8th was a duplicated man

-bRIAN



Hehe, yeah, I know what you mean.


Signature censored by forum moderators.
Go to Top of Page

Carl
- A 'Fifth' Catholic -

Ireland
11546 Posts

Posted - 07/13/2006 :  18:18:51  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=23845


Join the Cult Of Pob! And don't forget to listen to the Pobcast!
Go to Top of Page

TRANSMARINE
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
2002 Posts

Posted - 07/31/2006 :  08:10:26  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
OK.........I take EVERYTHING back.

This movie was fucking incredible!

Hank the 8th was a duplicated man

-bRIAN
Go to Top of Page

vilainde
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Niue
7443 Posts

Posted - 07/31/2006 :  08:25:48  Show Profile  Visit vilainde's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Good news. I read some blurb on imdb this morning that said critics were disappointed because the movie had little in common with the series. Uh... did anyone really want to see some Starsky & Hutch type of crap poking fun at the 80s?
<<"The TV series was noted for pastel color schemes, Don Johnson's narcissistic slickness and Philip Michael Thomas' piercing-eyed charisma," writes Philip Wuntch in the Dallas Morning News.>> Are you fucking kidding me?


Denis

Go to Top of Page

Cult_Of_Frank
= Black Noise Maker =

Canada
11687 Posts

Posted - 07/31/2006 :  08:48:28  Show Profile  Visit Cult_Of_Frank's Homepage  Reply with Quote
"Fucking incredible?" Are you kidding?!?!

It was one of the worst movies I've ever seen in theatres to the point that three of the four of us would've walked out if the fourth hadn't been passably amused and we there at his invitation. For a while it was sort of funny that dialogue would just transition to sex back and forth by a painfully cliched meeting of the eyes and changing of music. Then it got annoying. The battle at the end, before they went out, the painful conversation was to me the crux of the movie. Talk about action and tease as much as possible first.

The sex scenes were barely that. The action scenes were mostly uninteresting (except the trailer break-in, which alone brought the movie from 0 out of 10 to maybe 2). So much of the movie had so little to do with anything (the initial and drawn out scene in the nightclub at the beginning of the movie has NO ties to anything). I didn't really care about a single one of the characters. So many things were left unresolved anyway, that it's just as well.

The only vice here was that I went and paid to see this.


"No man remains quite what he was when he recognizes himself."
Go to Top of Page

TRANSMARINE
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
2002 Posts

Posted - 07/31/2006 :  09:21:02  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cult_Of_Frank

"Fucking incredible?" Are you kidding?!?!

So much of the movie had so little to do with anything (the initial and drawn out scene in the nightclub at the beginning of the movie has NO ties to anything). I didn't really care about a single one of the characters. So many things were left unresolved anyway, that it's just as well.


"No man remains quite what he was when he recognizes himself."



This was the core of the Miami Vice series stripped down to the moody, atmospheric, and surreal sterile Michael Mann logic. The series didn't make much sense...minimalist storylines which picked up in the middle of this and jarringly transferred to that, and didn't care if you followed it or not...but somehow it would reel you along. I was totally impressed...and with Mann (especially Miami Vice), the characters aren't always the story. The story isn't even the story. It's the souless decadence of the landscapes and juxtaposed emotions of architecture and beautiful violence...the beauty of cars and boats and planes on way, water and wing controlled by halved and mysterious men. Hightened reality of cops and robbers in a dead twilight zone of neon, black, and opaque internal communication that rarely let's the viewer into their thought process, which can be aggravating but, at least to me, intriguing. Mann's world of male engineering, both emotional and mental, has never been as frustratingly hidden or as frightfully exciting. I liked it a lot.

Hank the 8th was a duplicated man

-bRIAN
Go to Top of Page

Cult_Of_Frank
= Black Noise Maker =

Canada
11687 Posts

Posted - 07/31/2006 :  09:39:34  Show Profile  Visit Cult_Of_Frank's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I admit that you make a compelling argument for mood and using the characters and events to paint a scene rather than tell a story, I guess the scene painted didn't really engage me or seem like it had much to offer that hadn't been painted many times before. I did get the sense that style was the focal point of their energies rather than substance, from perpetual thunder to midnight approaches into Miami to the gritty reel used for most of the stuff in Latin America. But again, I think you can use all those stylistic devices to paint a picture and still have characters that are engaging and interesting and a story that is exciting or dramatic or at least not disjointed.

I never watched the series, perhaps that was part of my problem, but if this is true to form then I suppose good on them. My arguments against would be levelled equally on the series then as well.

Positive note: I enjoyed the flights.




"No man remains quite what he was when he recognizes himself."
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
-= Frank Black Forum =- © 2002-2020 Frank Black Fans, Inc. Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000