-= Frank Black Forum =-
-= Frank Black Forum =-
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Off Topic!
 General Chat
 Lab-Grown Meat
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

bishk99
- FB Fan -

United Kingdom
100 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:18:17  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Just found this article on the BBC website about the possibility of growing meat in a lab for consumption. I would be really interested to hear what everyones views were on this?

Personally it really creeps me out.

Putting the issues of cloning and genetic modification of foodstuffs aside for a second I have a Question for the Vegies on this board.

Do you think you could ever eat manufactured meat knowing that its based on a single animal even if it didn't suffer in the process? Say for example the cells to be cloned in the final product () were taken without harming the animal in any way.

I imagine that if manufactured meat was ever to become the norm the human race would eventually detach itself from what it actually is.

Soylent Green anyone?

-Bish

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4148164.stm

quote:

Scientists aim for lab-grown meat

Pork cuts could come fresh from the lab
An international research team has proposed new techniques that may lead to the mass production of meat reared not on the farm, but in the laboratory.


Developments in tissue engineering mean that cells taken from animals could be grown directly into meat in a laboratory, the researchers say.

Scientists believe the technology already exists to directly grow processed meat like a chicken nugget.

The technology could benefit both humans and the environment.

"With a single cell, you could theoretically produce the world's annual meat supply. And you could do it in a way that's better for the environment and human health.

"In the long term, this is a very feasible idea," said Jason Matheny of the University of Maryland, part of the team whose research has been published in the Tissue Engineering journal.

Growing the meat without the animal could reduce the need to keep millions of animals in cramped conditions and would lessen the damage caused by the meat production to the environment.

Laboratory-grown meat could also be healthier, proponents say.

Eating 'mush'

Tissue engineering techniques were first developed for medical use and small amounts of edible fish tissue have been grown in research conducted by Nasa.


Concerns have been raised about eating meat from cloned animals.
To industrialise the process, researchers suggest the cells could be grown on large sheets that would need to be stretched to provide the 'exercise' for the growing muscles.

"If you didn't stretch them, it would be like eating mush," said Mr Methany.

Whilst the technology to produce processed meat is here now, producing a steak or chicken breast is still quite a way off, the researchers say.

Questions

The new techniques could also provide a dilemma for vegetarians.

Some may feel able to eat meat that has been grown without an animal being harmed.

Others feel that question marks remain about the way the cells would be taken from animals.

"It won't appeal to someone who gave up meat because they think it's morally wrong to eat flesh or someone who doesn't want to eat anything unnatural," Kerry Bennett of the UK Vegetarian Society told the Guardian newspaper.

How regulators might react is also unclear.

The US Food and Drug Administration has asked companies not to market any products that involve cloned animals until their safety has been evaluated.







"Mine's a pint of the black stuff"
..."ha, You can't drink a pint of Bovril!"

Edited by - bishk99 on 08/15/2005 14:17:34

floop
= Wannabe Volunteer =

Mexico
15297 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:24:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
i think i'd rather become a vegetarian, as sad as it is for me to say that.

ok, maybe i would use it for burgers
Go to Top of Page

callahan
- FB Fan -

149 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:25:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Mmmmm. I could go for a cheeseburger right about now. Of course I'd prefer naturally raised beef, but I'll eat what's available. Usually I try to buy meats from places like Whole Foods. Hormone injected anything scares me.

I passed a cow and the cow was brown. My pyjamas clung to me like a shroud! Like a shroud!
Go to Top of Page

Carl
- A 'Fifth' Catholic -

Ireland
11546 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:28:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I saw this on Sky News yesterday. Apparently, it'll be a long time before they'll be able to do this.
Go to Top of Page

Cheeseman1000
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Iceland
8201 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:30:46  Show Profile  Visit Cheeseman1000's Homepage  Reply with Quote
C'mon, that would taste like nothing. It's all about properly fed/reared/cared for animals for flavour. That would suck.


How's that for a slice of fried gold?
Go to Top of Page

callahan
- FB Fan -

149 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:32:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Yeah, but the reality is that most meat that Americans consume is loaded with chemicals. It amazes me how different Naturally raised meat tastes from meat that you buy in a regular market. Believe me, I'm not all whoo whoo organic and birkenstocks (though I do own and love a pair)but I can really tell the difference.

I passed a cow and the cow was brown. My pyjamas clung to me like a shroud! Like a shroud!
Go to Top of Page

Carolynanna
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Canada
6556 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:33:40  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Speaking of which,
has anyone ever tried Kobe beef?

__________
Don't believe the hype.
Go to Top of Page

bishk99
- FB Fan -

United Kingdom
100 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:34:31  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Maybe they should launch it with a new name.

I suggest..... NEW-MEAT

-Bish





"Mine's a pint of the black stuff"
..."ha, You can't drink a pint of Bovril!"
Go to Top of Page

Llamadance
> Teenager of the Year <

United Kingdom
2543 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:35:28  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think it's a great idea. Don't see why it shouldn't be done, although it will probably lead to a massive reduction in sheep/cows/chickens. We've no idea how it'll taste, it might be fantastic. I expect ethical vegetarians will still snub it, but it would make sense.

And wasn't Soylent Green made from humans?


No power in the 'verse can stop me

Go to Top of Page

floop
= Wannabe Volunteer =

Mexico
15297 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:35:50  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Carolynanna

Speaking of which,
has anyone ever tried Kobe beef?



i had Kobe beef at this insanely expensive sushi restaurant once (it was my birthday).. i have to admit, it was one of the best things i've ever tasted
Go to Top of Page

Carl
- A 'Fifth' Catholic -

Ireland
11546 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:35:59  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
No, that was only a film.
Go to Top of Page

Carolynanna
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Canada
6556 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:36:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
ITS PEOPLE!!!

__________
Don't believe the hype.
Go to Top of Page

Carolynanna
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Canada
6556 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:36:43  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by floop

quote:
Originally posted by Carolynanna

Speaking of which,
has anyone ever tried Kobe beef?



i had Kobe beef at this insanely expensive sushi restaurant once (it was my birthday).. i have to admit, it was one of the best things i've ever tasted



It'd better freaking be for like $300/lb.

__________
Don't believe the hype.
Go to Top of Page

callahan
- FB Fan -

149 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:39:54  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Carolynanna

ITS PEOPLE!!!

__________
Don't believe the hype.

"If you want to dine with the cannibals, well darlin' you're gonna get eaten!"

I passed a cow and the cow was brown. My pyjamas clung to me like a shroud! Like a shroud!
Go to Top of Page

bishk99
- FB Fan -

United Kingdom
100 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:47:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:


And wasn't Soylent Green made from humans?




Yep, but i was only making the connection based on my last sentence. One day in the far future the human race will once again discover what new-meat® really is..

New-Meat® is Animals!





"Mine's a pint of the black stuff"
..."ha, You can't drink a pint of Bovril!"

Edited by - bishk99 on 08/15/2005 14:19:16
Go to Top of Page

Carolynanna
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Canada
6556 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:49:12  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Off topic but amusing (sorry bish)

I have a friend who bought a calf,
gave it to a lady to raise for her,
and then bought it back in parts for the freezer when it was ready.
The lady gave my friend a framed pic of herself and the calf which she named Otis.
Now when they have a meal they say,
we're eating Otis burgers, or an Otis sandwich etc.

__________
Don't believe the hype.
Go to Top of Page

Cheeseman1000
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Iceland
8201 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:53:51  Show Profile  Visit Cheeseman1000's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Llamadance

I think it's a great idea. Don't see why it shouldn't be done, although it will probably lead to a massive reduction in sheep/cows/chickens. We've no idea how it'll taste, it might be fantastic. I expect ethical vegetarians will still snub it, but it would make sense.

And wasn't Soylent Green made from humans?


No power in the 'verse can stop me



Judging by the difference between factory-farmed meat and free-range, I'd say lab-meat would taste vile. I'm a big believer in getting decent meat - generally (and selfishly!) the better the life the animal has had, the better the flavour...


How's that for a slice of fried gold?
Go to Top of Page

NimrodsSon
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1938 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  08:59:35  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by bishk99

Putting the issues of cloning and genetic modification of foodstuffs aside for a second I have Question for the Vegies on this board.

Do you think you could ever eat manufactured meat knowing that it based on a single animal even if it didn't suffer in the process? Say for example the cells to be cloned in the final product () were taken without harming the animal in any way.


In a word, No. Even if it could be done without harming the animals I wouldn't support it. I wouldn't eat it because humans shouldn't eat meat. Regardless of what you believe about animal rights, etc., meat is not something that humans should eat. And this can not be done without harming animals. It's just going to mean more testing and experiments, and instead of being machines on a farm, they become projects in a lab somewhere, which is oftentimes much more cruel.

My philosophy is that one shouldn't eat meat, but if the need arises and one feels they must eat meat, or if one simply can't resist the urge to eat meat, he or she should eat what they kill and only what they kill. None of this lab meat bullshit and none of the farm meat bullshit either. It's dehumanizing, not to mention degrading to the animals it's done to.


ˇViva los Católicos! http://adrianfoster.dmusic.com/
Go to Top of Page

zub_the_goat
= Cult of Ray =

United Kingdom
639 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  09:38:37  Show Profile  Visit zub_the_goat's Homepage  Click to see zub_the_goat's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
im still not entirely sure how i feel about this, i love meat...nothing better than a bacon sanwich.....and yes i do sometimes feel guilty about the piggies, wont eat heavily processed meat or in fast food restaurants if i can help it because (as well as obvious other reasons) the welfare of the animals...but i dont think grown meet would make me feel any better..its a piece of living tissue grown purely for cnsumption and has been manipulated beyond all recognition...just because it doesnt have a face doesnt make this an ethical option...its just not right, we dont need this as a society, we can self sustain if we werent so damn stupid about it
Go to Top of Page

kathryn
~ Selkie Bride ~

Belgium
15320 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  10:12:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by floop

i think i'd rather become a vegetarian, as sad as it is for me to say that.




This precious quote must be saved for future generations.


Sometimes, no matter how shitty things get, you have to just do a little dance. - Frank
Go to Top of Page

darwin
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

USA
5454 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  11:10:09  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NimrodsSon
In a word, No. Even if it could be done without harming the animals I wouldn't support it. I wouldn't eat it because humans shouldn't eat meat. Regardless of what you believe about animal rights, etc., meat is not something that humans should eat.



How so? We've been eating meat for millions of years. That's why you've got those pointy little teeth in the front. We're omnivores.
Go to Top of Page

Homers_pet_monkey
= Official forum monkey =

United Kingdom
17125 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  11:15:57  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I am not going near the stuff.

Besides, it would render my bow and arrows useless.


I'd walk her everyday, into a shady place
Go to Top of Page

starmekitten
-= Forum Pistolera =-

United Kingdom
6370 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  11:33:32  Show Profile  Visit starmekitten's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I'd eat it.

I could argue this better, but I'm too tired so you all carry on and I'll come and put you right in the morning.


You begin saving the world by saving one person at a time; all else is grandiose romanticism or politics
Go to Top of Page

NimrodsSon
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1938 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  14:13:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by darwin

quote:
Originally posted by NimrodsSon
In a word, No. Even if it could be done without harming the animals I wouldn't support it. I wouldn't eat it because humans shouldn't eat meat. Regardless of what you believe about animal rights, etc., meat is not something that humans should eat.



How so? We've been eating meat for millions of years. That's why you've got those pointy little teeth in the front. We're omnivores.



We have been eating meat for quite a long time, but if we have the means not to have to eat meat, we ideally should not. Meat is a bad food for humans for several reasons, including but not limited to its extreme acidity (being one of the most acid-forming foods you can possibly eat), it's complete proteins which can not be properly utilized by the human body, it's lifeless composition--meat is a dead food that is constantly deteriorating from the moment the animal is killed. It contains no living enzymes, which are the vital elements that constitute everything in our bodies. It can not be properly digested, leading to colon problems, as well as problems with the rest of our digestive systems.

Now, I'm not one of those people that will sit here and say that you'll automatically become exceedingly healthy by not eating meat. There are vegetables that we shouldn't eat as well, such as legumes that have been dried. We shouldn't eat any cooked foods, and we shouldn't eat many foods in certain combinations, such as starches and fruit at the same time. So I'm just saying that meat is one of many things that humans should not eat, ideally.


ˇViva los Católicos! http://adrianfoster.dmusic.com/
Go to Top of Page

speedy_m
= Frankofile =

Canada
3581 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  14:33:43  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I bet farmers will LOVE this idea.


and you are ill prepared to fight
living in a world of soft and white
in air conditioned battle zones
I pity you!
Go to Top of Page

starmekitten
-= Forum Pistolera =-

United Kingdom
6370 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  14:37:15  Show Profile  Visit starmekitten's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Nimrods Son, complete proteins which are broken down by the body (because we have the pathways to do that) and from which are harvested the essential amino acids which we ourselves cannot produce and are then reformed into proteins we do use.

We're meat eaters, thats what we are. People can chose not to but we're biologically built to consume the stuff.


You begin saving the world by saving one person at a time; all else is grandiose romanticism or politics
Go to Top of Page

darwin
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

USA
5454 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  14:43:29  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
What is a living enzyme? Enzymes are simply proteins and none of them are 'living'.

{updated, because I think this comes off a little dickish from me}

Is "living enzyme" the theory behind naked foods? That heating breaks up the enzymes and makes them less useful? It seems like a fad to me, but I haven't read any of the books.

Edited by - darwin on 08/15/2005 14:55:53
Go to Top of Page

kathryn
~ Selkie Bride ~

Belgium
15320 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  14:45:27  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Dammit, darwin, we should have ordered lab-grown meat at dinner!




Sometimes, no matter how shitty things get, you have to just do a little dance. - Frank
Go to Top of Page

callahan
- FB Fan -

149 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  15:10:58  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by darwin

What is a living enzyme? Enzymes are simply proteins and none of them are 'living'.

{updated, because I think this comes off a little dickish from me}

Is "living enzyme" the theory behind naked foods? That heating breaks up the enzymes and makes them less useful? It seems like a fad to me, but I haven't read any of the books.

That's pretty much it. The theory is that eating cooked foods depletes enzymes which our livers, pancreas and other organs produce. Raw foods have their own enzymes that break down and help to digest the foods themselves. So, if we eat more raw food our organs have to do less work. As we get older we produce less and less enzymes within our bodies.

A little interesting fact: If you take a bite of raw food, a carrot or lettuce for instance, before you eat anything cooked, you trick your body into thinking that the cooked food is raw and your organs won't work overtime to produce enzymes.

That said, I rarely eat anything raw except for a pretty basic salad.

I passed a cow and the cow was brown. My pyjamas clung to me like a shroud! Like a shroud!
Go to Top of Page

NimrodsSon
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1938 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  15:56:52  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by starmekitten

Nimrods Son, complete proteins which are broken down by the body (because we have the pathways to do that) and from which are harvested the essential amino acids which we ourselves cannot produce and are then reformed into proteins we do use.

We're meat eaters, thats what we are. People can chose not to but we're biologically built to consume the stuff.


You begin saving the world by saving one person at a time; all else is grandiose romanticism or politics



(So as not to be guilty of plagiarism, let me first say that this information comes primarily from Dr. Norman Walker's books Vibrant Health and The Vegetarian Guide to Diet and Salad. Anything in quotes was written by Dr. Norman Walker.)

Yes, the complete animal proteins can be broken down by the body but this is HIGHLY INEFFICIENT, as you'll see. The building blocks of protein are amino acids, which are made up of atoms. I think we can agree on this. There are twenty-three known amino acids, all of which are important in the proper functioning of the human body. Now, to quote Dr. Walker, "The protein composing the flesh of animals, fish and fowl, was built up in the respective bodies from the live, organic atoms in the raw food they were nourished with. Such flesh, of course, is a complete protein. Before the body can digest such protein, however, it must break it down not only into the original amino acids, but also into the original atoms in order that it may build up its own protein from these original atoms and primary amino acids." Now, this is in line with what you said, but my point is, rather than this inefficient process of breaking down the protein only to build it back up, the body should obtain its protein from fruits and vegetables, which, instead of being complete proteins, have the atoms necessary to form the amino acids that are formed into complete proteins in our bodies. Would it not then be logical to say that the best source of protein is not in the complete proteins (not to mention DEAD proteins, since the atoms that compose the amino acids that compose the complete protein die within minutes after the animal is killed) in flesh foods, but rather the atoms found in all fruits and vegetables which are the building blocks for these amino acids, which are the building blocks for protein. OF COURSE this is the case! It's only logical to say that instead of the body having to break down the complete proteins of animal food (which are DEAD, as I've said) to amino acids and then to the atoms that compose the amino acids, so that it can build these up into its own protein, it should rather obtain its protein from vegetables and fruits, thereby foregoing the process of breaking down the protein and rather immediately building it up from the individual atoms. Dr. Walker points out that, "During the processes by which flesh proteins are digested, resulting in the breaking down of the protein into its component amino acids, a certain amount of heat is liberated within the body which makes one feel stimulated and energetic. This helps to keep up the body temperature but is not utilized for the energy needs of the working cells of the body. This amount of energy is therefore wasted and more protein would be needed than would be the case if all its potential energy were utilized. The amino acids from the meat thus ingested are not therefore reconstructed into body protein and are virtually wasted, resulting in this uric acid being added to the uric acid resulting from muscular functions." And this goes into another issue altogether with meat, which is the uric acid generated when meat and other concentrated proteins are digested.

Now, to answer Darwin's question about enzymes, enzymes aren't simply proteins, and they are very much ALIVE, that is, until they are heated to 130 degrees faranheight (sp?). Enzymes "constitute the life principle in every atom and molecule composing every LIVE organism." Fresh, live enzymes in abundance are the single most important thing that we should be sure to eat. I could go on and on about enzymes, but I'll leave it to you, if you're interested in knowing more, to purchase some of Dr. Walker's books (I highly recommend The Vegetarian Guide to Diet and Salad) and read about the importance of living enzymes. I guess the whole enzyme and raw food thing has become somewhat of a fad these days, but there is, nonetheless, a great deal of truth to it.


ˇViva los Católicos! http://adrianfoster.dmusic.com/
Go to Top of Page

Cheeseman1000
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Iceland
8201 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  16:12:27  Show Profile  Visit Cheeseman1000's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Yeah, but mmm! Meat!


How's that for a slice of fried gold?
Go to Top of Page

darwin
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

USA
5454 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  16:28:27  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NimrodsSon
Would it not then be logical to say that the best source of protein is not in the complete proteins (not to mention DEAD proteins, since the atoms that compose the amino acids that compose the complete protein die within minutes after the animal is killed) in flesh foods, but rather the atoms found in all fruits and vegetables which are the building blocks for these amino acids, which are the building blocks for protein.


Proteins don't die. They were never alive in the first place. They're just chains of amino acids. And, CERTAINLY atoms don't die. If atoms died (fell apart), we wouldn't have any physical items. My chair would be crumbling beneath me.

And the proteins in fruits and vegetables also break down. They rot.

quote:
Now, to answer Darwin's question about enzymes, enzymes aren't simply proteins, and they are very much ALIVE, that is, until they are heated to 130 degrees faranheight (sp?).


An enzyme is just a type of protein.

A definition of enzyme: Any of numerous proteins or conjugated proteins produced by living organisms and functioning as biochemical catalysts.

quote:
Enzymes "constitute the life principle in every atom and molecule composing every LIVE organism." Fresh, live enzymes in abundance are the single most important thing that we should be sure to eat.


Constitute the life principle in every atom? That makes no sense to me. Enzymes aren't in atoms or molecules. Sorry, but I think this new age hoey. Enzymes simply allow reactions to occur with less energy having to be expended. They catalyze reactions.

Edited by - darwin on 08/15/2005 16:30:38
Go to Top of Page

callahan
- FB Fan -

149 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  17:04:00  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Sorry, but I think this new age hoey. Enzymes simply allow reactions to occur with less energy having to be expended. They catalyze reactions.

Well that's pretty much what I was saying. I think cooking of meats and vegetables destroys the enzymes in the food itself forcing the body to use enzymes it manufactures.

I passed a cow and the cow was brown. My pyjamas clung to me like a shroud! Like a shroud!
Go to Top of Page

darwin
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

USA
5454 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  17:06:42  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
But, I don't think (but I may be wrong) that the enzymes in a carrot that allow it to do things like photosynthesis do our body any good. Enzymes are specific to particular reactions.
Go to Top of Page

NimrodsSon
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1938 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  17:44:42  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by darwin
Proteins don't die. They were never alive in the first place. They're just chains of amino acids. And, CERTAINLY atoms don't die. If atoms died (fell apart), we wouldn't have any physical items. My chair would be crumbling beneath me.


To quote Dr. Walker:
quote:
Taken from The Vegetarian Guide to Diet and Salad by Dr. Norman W. Walker, D.Sc.

...in the protein of a live man or animal, the amino acids are the means of such a vast field of activities that no physical function is possible without them in live, vital, organic form.

The importance of VITALITY in the atoms composing the amino acids can best be appreciated by realizing that within 6 minutes after life leaves the body all the atoms in the body cease to be live, organic atoms, and their function and activity consequently comes to a stop. So long as life is present in the body, the live atoms therein have the vital spark of life which enables them to carry on their work.

Atoms are not like animals whose life is apparent and perceived in active animation. Nevertheless, the vital principle wither is, or is not present in an atom. If it is present, that atom is a live organism capable of furnishing vital force and energy. if life is not present in it then the atom is inorganic and as such belongs to the mineral kingdom.

...

The mineral kingdom contains all the atoms composing this world, in inorganic form. Each of these atoms, while in the mineral kingdom state, has certain definitive rates of vibration, but no life-principle is present...

...When the life of vegetation is destroyed by heat, the atoms composing such vegetation automatically revert to the mineral kingdom state, as we cannot have life and death in anything at one and the same time.



You said:
quote:
And the proteins in fruits and vegetables also break down. They rot.


Which is why it is of the utmost importance to buy the freshest fruits and vegetables possible, or if you have the means, to grow your own.

quote:
An enzyme is just a type of protein.

A definition of enzyme: Any of numerous proteins or conjugated proteins produced by living organisms and functioning as biochemical catalysts.

quote:
Enzymes "constitute the life principle in every atom and molecule composing every LIVE organism." Fresh, live enzymes in abundance are the single most important thing that we should be sure to eat.


Constitute the life principle in every atom? That makes no sense to me. Enzymes aren't in atoms or molecules. Sorry, but I think this new age hoey. Enzymes simply allow reactions to occur with less energy having to be expended. They catalyze reactions.



Dr. Walker:
quote:
Natural foods, in their natural raw state contain life in the atoms and molecules composing

them
[my italics]. Such atomic LIFE is classified as ENZYMES.


quote:
As Enzymes form the fundemental basis of nutrition, they should have our first consideration in

the choice of our food. Enzymes are not substances which man can create, nor are they capable of being

synthesized for use as supplements for constructive purposes.

Enzymes are the life-principle in every live, organic atom and molecule, whether such atoms compose vegetation or are the atoms and molecules in the constitution of the human and animal bodies.

...

The Enzymes in the body give the spark of activity to every cell and tissue, as well as to their functions, so long as the body is alive. The moment the body dies, the life represented by its Enzymes is dissipated, at which time the atoms and molecules and the cells and tissues composing the anatomy are no longer subject to regeneration and begin to decompose.

Enzymes in your food are the life in the atoms and molecules constituting the food.


On the function of enzymess:
quote:

In the course of the voluntary and involuntary activites of the body we expend considerable unconscious energy. This energy is furnished b y the Enzymes in the atoms in the cells and tissues...


quote:
The mysterious operation of our digestive system takes place by virtue of the Enzymes which are present in every live atom and molecule composing the cells and tissues of the body and consequently in all the performances and functions of the human system.

In the constitution of the body there are strange and intricate laboratories in which ultramicroscopic vital substances are generated.... These vital substances are known as hormones which trickle directly into the bloodstream by the process of osmosis.... It is the presence of Enzymes throughout each gland that makes this transfer possible.


An example of the importance of enzymes:
quote:
[the importance of live enzymes] is graphically observed when a farmer tries to feed pasteurized milk to a calf.... Calves fed on pasteurized milk have died within six months.




ˇViva los Católicos! http://adrianfoster.dmusic.com/
Go to Top of Page

Daisy Girl
~ Abstract Brain ~

Belize
5305 Posts

Posted - 08/15/2005 :  19:15:51  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
from an environmental standpoint, it's more sustainable and has less impact.

"I ain't goin to be what I ain't"
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
-= Frank Black Forum =- © 2002-2020 Frank Black Fans, Inc. Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000