-= Frank Black Forum =-
-= Frank Black Forum =-
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Frank Black Chat
 Planet of Sound - Pixies News Items
 Album 10
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page
Author  Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

billgoodman
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Netherlands
6290 Posts

Posted - 08/01/2025 :  06:21:27  Show Profile  Click to see billgoodman's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
yeah, maybe next year. Sept/oct 2027. Hope we will make it!

---------------------------
BF: Mag ik Engels spreken?
Go to Top of Page

Joey Joe Jo Jr. Chabadoo
* Dog in the Sand *

1092 Posts

Posted - 08/04/2025 :  07:15:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I just hope they could deliver something great (not something like the latest album).
I dream of a new producer.

++++
Go to Top of Page

Troubles A Foot
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1050 Posts

Posted - 08/04/2025 :  08:20:34  Show Profile  Visit Troubles A Foot's Homepage  Reply with Quote
After this last one, new Pixies albums are now met with extreme trepidation from me, and not something I look forward to anymore. Just something I'll be curious about and have anxiety that it will be really bad and further distance me from the band.

I say let them take their time making it.
Go to Top of Page

oddball
- FB Fan -

Germany
244 Posts

Posted - 08/04/2025 :  11:11:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Or take the opposite approach in favor of spontaneity. It seems like content from many sessions in recent years has been shelved (Halloween sessions from way back when, Superlecker sessions, whatever happened last year in England, etc.). Take the FB & the Cs route and get this stuff out! Or release it through Frank Black or Black Francis or whatever, and save other content for Pixies albums. He's too prolific of a songwriter to keep things in the can. Just my two cents. I just think of artists who take their time and go with releases every three to four years, only to disappoint in the end.
-oddball
Go to Top of Page

Brank_Flack
* Dog in the Sand *

Canada
1072 Posts

Posted - 08/05/2025 :  06:22:02  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Yeah, at this point I would take spontaneity and regular releases as well. Less pressure for each album to be a statement or return-to-form "NEW PIXIES ALBUM", and Charles has been very clear that he writes spontaneously for upcoming recording sessions. The only difference between an album every year and every few years, I reckon at least, is fewer albums, not fewer considered classics.

Changing their name from the Pixies would also help, but it would be financial suicide.
Go to Top of Page

Troubles A Foot
* Dog in the Sand *

USA
1050 Posts

Posted - 08/05/2025 :  13:36:25  Show Profile  Visit Troubles A Foot's Homepage  Reply with Quote
God just be Frank Black again and work with whoever
Go to Top of Page

two reelers
* Dog in the Sand *

Austria
1074 Posts

Posted - 08/06/2025 :  00:52:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I would more look forward to a Cult of Ray 30-year anniversary tour, bringing back Lyle and the origial catholics line-up. And bookend the show with side A and side B of FB self-titled, of course with EDF and Nick Vincent.

I joined the cult of Souled American / 'cause they are a damn' fine band
Go to Top of Page

Skatealex1
* Dog in the Sand *

1708 Posts

Posted - 08/06/2025 :  12:03:45  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'd kill for more FB recording stuff over more Pixies. At the very least a new producer if Pixies will keep doing their thing.

Pixies turning into a classic rock band just seems kind of boring IMO.(Tom Dalgetys influences apparently)

Also the TOTY reunion shows sounded so good. I think it could've been interesting to hear what it'd sound like if they tried something new.
Go to Top of Page

two reelers
* Dog in the Sand *

Austria
1074 Posts

Posted - 08/06/2025 :  23:00:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:


Pixies turning into a classic rock band just seems kind of boring IMO.(Tom Dalgetys influences apparently)




My feeling about Pixies 2.0 has never been been captured more accurately as in this one sentence.



I joined the cult of Souled American / 'cause they are a damn' fine band
Go to Top of Page

Bedbug
> Teenager of the Year <

3265 Posts

Posted - 08/07/2025 :  10:36:21  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Troubles A Foot

God just be Frank Black again and work with whoever



This sums it up nicely for me
Go to Top of Page

Brank_Flack
* Dog in the Sand *

Canada
1072 Posts

Posted - 08/07/2025 :  11:43:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm fine with whoever he chooses to play with, including the Pixies who aren't a shabby backing band. At this points, I consider Pixies 2.0 albums as extensions of the Frank Black/Black Francis solo discography rather than the Pixies 1.0 canon, which helps me be less finicky about each new release. In the grand scheme of his post-TOTY albums, I think the Pixies 2.0 albums are all solid, with BTE in the DITS and Bluefinger camp of post-imperial classics, Indie Cindy being in the next tier, and HC/Doggerel/TNTZC being in the middle rather than lower tier.

A change of producers would excite me more than a change of band, but I can live with Tom. I do think Tom is in part responsible for the classic rock sound of Pixies 2.0, but let's also not pretend FB's output beginning with Frank Black and the Catholics hasn't been increasingly classic rock rather than indie/alternative/college radio orientated. I reckon what they need is a producer who pushes them away from their instincts towards classic rock (like Norton did on IC) rather than one who leans in on it (i.e., Tom).
Go to Top of Page

Stevio10
* Dog in the Sand *

United Kingdom
1137 Posts

Posted - 08/07/2025 :  12:57:27  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Yeah agree with these points. Kinda sums it up when Pixies social media posts tribute to Ozzy Osbourne but will neglect Brian Wilson or David Thomas - nothing against Ozzy love him but love the others as well.

Maybe in 2025 it's just enough to be relevant and touring, staying in the circuit. Pixies do that very well and a new album every couple of year helps.

But let's face it, it's the classic material that sells tickets. It's interesting they have a night for Trompe / Bossanova and a night for a classic set. Why don't they have a night for 2.0 material? I doubt it would sell as well.

It seems they put faith in Tom helping them stay relevant in a world where alt rock is diminishing and their peers are no longer around or relevant.

Personally I would like a Frank Black album every year or two - doesn't need to tour it, just release stuff for people who want it. Pixies make up with Kim, tour classic material every few years. Sounds like a decent compromise to me.
Go to Top of Page

Bedbug
> Teenager of the Year <

3265 Posts

Posted - 08/07/2025 :  17:29:54  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Brank_Flack

I'm fine with whoever he chooses to play with, including the Pixies who aren't a shabby backing band. At this points, I consider Pixies 2.0 albums as extensions of the Frank Black/Black Francis solo discography rather than the Pixies 1.0 canon, which helps me be less finicky about each new release. In the grand scheme of his post-TOTY albums, I think the Pixies 2.0 albums are all solid, with BTE in the DITS and Bluefinger camp of post-imperial classics, Indie Cindy being in the next tier, and HC/Doggerel/TNTZC being in the middle rather than lower tier.

A change of producers would excite me more than a change of band, but I can live with Tom. I do think Tom is in part responsible for the classic rock sound of Pixies 2.0, but let's also not pretend FB's output beginning with Frank Black and the Catholics hasn't been increasingly classic rock rather than indie/alternative/college radio orientated. I reckon what they need is a producer who pushes them away from their instincts towards classic rock (like Norton did on IC) rather than one who leans in on it (i.e., Tom).



Agreed, and I've been saying this for a long time (probably thought it when TLM came out) and apparently I still don't get tired of talking about it: 2.0 is best seen as Frank Black and the Pixies not the Pixies, for a number of reasons.

If a genie asked me what would I want this next album to be, I honestly don't know what I would ask for. I'm really happy with all of 2.0 and wouldn't really change much. But I'm definitely open to something totally different sounding as well.
Go to Top of Page

Skatealex1
* Dog in the Sand *

1708 Posts

Posted - 08/07/2025 :  17:39:58  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I agree with 2.0 as being Frank Black and Pixies, etc... I just kinda wish he could tap a little more into the older approach a bit somehow.

I'm sure a new producer could make a big difference here as has been mentioned. The fact that the BTE demos are possibly some of my favorite Pixies 2.0 releases kinda suggests that for me. Those songs kind of have the more spontaneous feel I get from some of Franks best solo works (IMO) including with the Catholics and the seemingly low production on those actually elevates it for me.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2  Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
-= Frank Black Forum =- © 2002-2020 Frank Black Fans, Inc. Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000