-= Frank Black Forum =-
-= Frank Black Forum =-
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Frank Black Chat
 Frank Black Making Noise
 Metacritic - SMYT
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Ten Percenter
- FB Enquirer -

United Kingdom
1733 Posts

Posted - 09/08/2003 :  06:11:48  Show Profile
Metacritic have posted three reviews so far - unfortunately the Q review will no doubt be added soon:

http://www.metacritic.com/music/artists/blackfrankandthecatholics/showmeyourtears/

No man is an island, unless he is in the bath

vilainde
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Niue
7443 Posts

Posted - 09/08/2003 :  06:29:12  Show Profile  Visit vilainde's Homepage
Metacritic is great, but they always underrated Frank's records for some reasons. BLD & DW scored respectively 56 and 55 though they had some good reviews overall.


Denis
Go to Top of Page

vilainde
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Niue
7443 Posts

Posted - 09/09/2003 :  05:41:04  Show Profile  Visit vilainde's Homepage
What did we say? Those suckers at Metacritic did add Q's review, AND underrated the album giving it a score of 62 (if you calculate the average note given by the 6 reviews they have, it makes 67 and not 62). And look how they summed up Blender's review... The article actually said "Important? No. Remarkable? Not really. But at least Black is neither in the shadow of nor looking to recapture his past glories." That makes a difference. I fucking hate them.


Denis
Go to Top of Page

Ten Percenter
- FB Enquirer -

United Kingdom
1733 Posts

Posted - 09/09/2003 :  06:38:53  Show Profile
Did Q not give 2 stars out of five? If so, should that be 40 and not 30? I agree with your other points as well Denis.

No man is an island, unless he is in the bath
Go to Top of Page

Brackish Heart
- FB Fan -

Australia
176 Posts

Posted - 09/09/2003 :  17:53:49  Show Profile  Visit Brackish Heart's Homepage  Click to see Brackish Heart's MSN Messenger address
quote:
AND underrated the album giving it a score of 62 (if you calculate the average note given by the 6 reviews they have, it makes 67 and not 62).
.

From metacritic...

"The METASCORE is considered a weighted average because we assign more significance, or weight, to some critics and publications than we do to others, based on the overall stature and quality of those critics and publications. In addition, in some circumstances, we also normalize the resulting scores (akin to "grading on a curve" in college), which prevents scores from clumping together. "

- looks like Q magazine has a lot of stature unfortunately.
Go to Top of Page

Ten Percenter
- FB Enquirer -

United Kingdom
1733 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2003 :  01:33:25  Show Profile
Should two stars out of five not equate to 40 from the shite mountain that is Q?

No man is an island, unless he is in the bath
Go to Top of Page

PixieSteve
> Teenager of the Year <

Poland
4698 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2003 :  05:40:17  Show Profile
The average user rating for this album is
9.7 out of 10 (3 Votes). :D

and i'll see if i can complain about Q being 30 and not 40 :)

done. also, i think Q is quite respected so if they do add the extra 10, it should count for something in the metascore.

Edited by - PixieSteve on 09/10/2003 05:49:45
Go to Top of Page

vilainde
>> Denizen of the Citizens Band <<

Niue
7443 Posts

Posted - 09/11/2003 :  08:45:32  Show Profile  Visit vilainde's Homepage
The score is slowly increasing... It's now 67 thanks to the Uncut review.


Denis
Go to Top of Page

PixieSteve
> Teenager of the Year <

Poland
4698 Posts

Posted - 09/11/2003 :  08:55:30  Show Profile
"Since Q is one of several magazines that do not award 1/2 stars, we sometimes will adjust their scores up or down by 1/2 star if necessary to more accurately reflect the text of the review. This happens frequently when an album receives a positive, favorable review but only is assigned 3 stars by the magazine (which translates to a relatively poor 60 out of 100 on Metacritic)--in such cases, we'd bump the score to 3.5 stars (or 70/100). In the case of the Frank Black review, the score was adjusted in the other direction."

jason dietz
metacritic.com | we deal with criticism

what bullshit! fair enough if they change the metascore to what they see fit but don't fuck with the individual reviews!
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
-= Frank Black Forum =- © 2002-2020 Frank Black Fans, Inc. Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000