-= Frank Black Forum =-
-= Frank Black Forum =-
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Off Topic!
 General Chat
 Distraught-What would you do?

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Carolynanna Posted - 02/20/2004 : 09:32:45
I realize this another totally non-FB-related post but heregoes;

This may sound silly to some but I was totally distressed,
today I ran over a squirrel.

We've been having some nice weather and these critters seem to be out in droves and let me tell you they don't use the crosswalk either. So Chip ran out and I hit him by accident. I have never hit anything before so I pulled over and got out to see most of the back end of this poor little vermin squished flat and stuck to the road. But to my horror it was still alive (obviously not for too much longer) and flipping right out. I knew it was dying and didn't want it to suffer so I bashed its brains in with the heel of my boot :(

What would you have done?
35   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
shineoftheever Posted - 03/11/2005 : 13:39:03
good to hear C, 'cause i'm gonna squash you in our cribbage rubber match just like you did that poor chipmunk, hehe, just kidding, but no, seriously, i would have probably ran over the head part, wouldn't want any blood and guts and brains on my bootheels.


You can go eat a decroded piece of crap!
kathryn Posted - 03/11/2005 : 11:57:33
Dear Carolyn

I only now read this thread. I am sorry for the trauma
you have undergone and I pray that you and your
family are overcoming this adversity via Frank's love
and music.

Please know that I believe you did your best under
difficult circumstance. Me, I would have stepped on the sucker's little head as hard I could. Stomped and stomped its
brain out.

Signed

Vegetarian Since 1982


I still believe in the excellent joy of the Catholics
Carolynanna Posted - 03/11/2005 : 08:12:01
quote:
Originally posted by shineoftheever

just wondering if you got over this traumatic experience C?


You can go eat a decroded piece of crap!



Ah well thanks for asking.
I'm okay but I still have nightmares..
Therapy's been helping.

__________
Godfather of nothing, ancesters of none.
Black glasses and feedback took my sense of fun.
darwin Posted - 03/11/2005 : 00:53:29
Today seems to be "the best of floop vs. erebus".
n/a Posted - 03/11/2005 : 00:37:30
I see...getting all the old threads back. But that's funny!


If you want something don't ask for nothing
if you want nothing don't ask for something!
shineoftheever Posted - 03/11/2005 : 00:35:40
i'm bored rita.


You can go eat a decroded piece of crap!
n/a Posted - 03/11/2005 : 00:28:03
Carolyn, I think that you did the right thing, you were brave enough to do it, I think I would never be able to do that if I had to.

Floop, didn't knew that you were that sensible about animals, what about our friend "the pork"? Doesn't he deserves a life too?

Why is this thread back again? Just noticed that it is so old...


If you want something don't ask for nothing
if you want nothing don't ask for something!
shineoftheever Posted - 03/11/2005 : 00:13:38
just wondering if you got over this traumatic experience C?


You can go eat a decroded piece of crap!
Erebus Posted - 02/27/2004 : 16:21:18
quote:
Originally posted by floop

quote:
Originally posted by Erebus

I don't think people can choose what to believe. And perhaps life needs to be defended, but I doubt it deserves it. Thanks for the comments.



is this a cry for help?

Just observing that only that possessed of merit may be said to deserve. At best life, as a form, exists in a state of ethical neutrality. Life just is. Life is a manifestation of matter, devoid of merit, as is all matter/energy. We are desparate organisms, with meager capacities for pleasure and apparently subtly adapted for suffering, floating on a rock within infinite expanses of space and time. What kinda help you got?
floop Posted - 02/27/2004 : 14:55:04
quote:
Originally posted by Erebus

I don't think people can choose what to believe. And perhaps life needs to be defended, but I doubt it deserves it. Thanks for the comments.



is this a cry for help?
TheCroutonFuton Posted - 02/27/2004 : 12:56:21


I was at an island in Lake Erie a couple of years ago with a friend who has a house there. I love skipping stones...I used to be a side-armed pitcher so it's very easy for me to skip large or strangely shaped stones. Well he and I were skipping stones on the lake one evening and I had this very large, somewhat sharp rock. I threw it perfectly...but it skipped quite a long ways..hit a wave just the wrong way and hit this duck that had come out of nowhere. It started to fly away but one of it's wings was broken! So we went back and got a net so we could try and take the duck to a veterinarian that lives there. We caught the duck and went to the vet's house but he wasn't on the island at the time! So we took the duck back into the water and let him go. I've never felt so horrible in my life. His other neighbor (who is literally retarded) didn't help things either..she just came up to me and started yelling about how I did it on purpose and how she should throw rocks at me. That made me so sad because I didn't do it on purpose at all! I didn't even see the poor duck. I hope he got better...aww..it still gets me really depressed...meh. I absolutely despise people who torture animals on purpose. I think Cobain put it well when he said:

"If you're really a mean person you're going to come back as a fly and eat poop. You'll come back as a fly or Matt Lukin."

"Join the Cult of Gunn / And Then You'll Be Destined to be a Rock and Roll Star of Epical Proportions!"
GoddessTheory Posted - 02/27/2004 : 12:18:31
Brilliant. Well, this conversation is Oh-ver.

It's been.
Erebus Posted - 02/27/2004 : 12:02:54
quote:
Originally posted by GoddessTheory

So maybe before you continue posting "this is this and that is that" you may want to back off the forcefulness of your statements
Give me a reason to and perhaps I will.
GoddessTheory Posted - 02/27/2004 : 11:45:25
I can't even competently explain why I don't care.

I don't go around stating whatever I say is the be all and end all.

Free will is a myth says you.

You are not wrong. You are not right. it's just what you say.

You could sit here and post "The Sky is Blue" but it's not where I sit, buddy.

So maybe before you continue posting "this is this and that is that" you may want to back off the forcefulness of your statements and open up to the fact that not everyone thinks like you or believes in you at all.
Erebus Posted - 02/27/2004 : 10:08:36
For starters, free will is a myth. I KNOW that you cannot competently explain what you mean by "choosing to believe".
GoddessTheory Posted - 02/27/2004 : 09:38:33
quote:
Originally posted by Erebus

I don't think people can choose what to believe.



Watch me.

I don't believe that in the slightest. And I don't even care to hear how you can back up such a statement.
Erebus Posted - 02/27/2004 : 09:16:35
I don't think people can choose what to believe. And perhaps life needs to be defended, but I doubt it deserves it. Thanks for the comments.
Bartholomew Posted - 02/26/2004 : 09:31:19
Wow, I hadn’t bothered to read the entire thread before posting. After hearing Erebus’ comments I feel compelled to comment if for no other reason than to defend life itself. And I think ol life deserves that. Basically, Erebus, you are either wrong or right, correct? Either there is no point to our existence or there is. So why not choose to believe you can in fact make a difference. Nothing to lose either way, right. This way you live a more fulfilled and satisfied life, see. While still not perfect, if’s far more enjoyable than the bleak view.
Bartholomew Posted - 02/26/2004 : 06:43:49
The worst anumal to hit is a turtle. That meaty “thwop” sound is horrible. One time I hit a bird. It flew into the glass of my driver’s side window. If I had the window down, it may have killed me. Weird to think... There’s a town not far from me famous for its albino squirrels. It’s like 90% albino’s, 10% brown. Although surely there are some mulattos in the mix. All these posts remind me of that hilarious deer scene in “The Straight Story”. That’s really how it is out here in the country. Like they come out of nowhere. ramble ramble ramble... Me, I just keep on driving when I hit squirrels. It’s easier on the soul that way.
floop Posted - 02/25/2004 : 23:27:43
sorry if that sounded harsh erebus.. i just feel like, if you're going to throw an opinion out there, you should be willing to back up what you're talking about.

i usually appreciate your posts too (as someone else stated), though i don't see eye to eye with you on this topic.
Erebus Posted - 02/24/2004 : 18:24:42
Sorry, I guess I didn't realize how that would be taken. It's not that I don't care. It's just that it seems to follow a familiar pattern where I post cryptic remarks, followed by an unconventional explanation which is then rejected by most. I would prefer to restrict myself to short posts but it seems they never capture the gist. The final paragraph was added to offer insight into how I feel about the usefulness of such exercises, as a practical matter. I do care, too much, but caring seems to make such little difference.
floop Posted - 02/24/2004 : 17:17:54
quote:
Originally posted by Erebus
Fair question. As for myself, I'm not doing squat. Life is just something that matter does. But life does entail capacities for pleasure and pain so I live to optimize the balance. However, I suggest to those who maintain that there is more to life that they vote to adopt social policies which will force a more realistic relationship with nature. Humans use intelligence to control their vulnerability to consequences of decisions. If, rather, we constrained ourselves to governmental policies that resulted in more immediate feedback for behavior, we would be better off in the long run (assuming it actually means anything to use such terms as "better"). Examples, in brief: Government should not be involved in social welfare, education, health care, etc. If couples have more children then they can support, they should face the consequences. If a single parent, admittedly most often the mother, is stranded with children, govt should not dictate that the “deadbeat dad” should pay child support/alimony. The mother made a poor choice of mates. Let that choice play out. Let the 12 year olds of the community see how serious this game of life is. Let those who made the mistake pay for it, if only in the form of the suffering of their children (their DNA), growing up under deprived conditions. (Marriage should be treated as contractual arrangement. People should be able to printout a five page generic contract which spells out responsibilities in the event of divorce or abandonment. If dispute ensues, take it to court on the basis of breach of contract, but the govt should make no blanket laws dictating how much party A should pay to party B.) Make school attendance voluntary, and fund ALL schools from user fees. Pay as you go for everything, especially education and health care. If the student screws up, throw him out. Let him grow up as a street urchin, into a criminal, and deal with him as criminal, again without spending any public money on his imprisonment. Or let him mend his ways and attempt to get back into school, having seen the better way. But most of all, let there be immediate consequences for decisions, poor and good. Extend these principles of freedom, responsiblity, and proportionality into every aspect of human existence. All of this is not to say that private charities cannot exist. Or that groups cannot privately and voluntarily pool their resources for common ends and services.

Of course this sounds cruel by the lights of today, but I would maintain that is mostly because we have allowed things to get so far out shape. If such measures had been implemented long ago the present day would be much kinder than it is. We would exist in a state of moderation with the actualities of nature, to include human nature. But we all know none of what I propose has a snowflake's chance of being adopted. No, we'll continue on our way to the best of our ability, either eventually taking it so far that the whole structure collapses into, ironically, a condition much like that I recommend, or more likely, and pessimistically, gradually subsiding into the society glimpsed in A Clockwork Orange. Can't say we don't deserve it.

Anyway, floop, it’s not so much that I would prescribe specific behaviors as it is that I would suggest society make certain global changes of moral philosophy and applications thereof, and then the changes of the human relation to nature would ensue. I suggest that such changes would be conducive to richer and more authentic lives (if one believes such distinctions are possible). I for one know that I would soon disappear under the very regime I champion, but that’s OK. Life is not worth so much that I’d be willing to struggle for it.

Despite appearances to the contrary, I really dislike these diatribes and running debates. They require too much work. I’d prefer to simply snipe from distant trees and hills, at targets of opportunity. Guess one needs more than snipers to fight a war. But by writing a few quick and dirty paragraphs I open myself to countless valid objections which I really would prefer not do deal with. It all seems so pointless. How often is anyone actually convinced by any of this? Sure, it can be fun, but I really only enjoy the sniping. After all, sniping’s so clinical; no need for an up-close experience of the bloody realities on the receiving end.





if you take the approach that you'd rather not deal with discussing these things (after throwing an opinion out there), then i guess your opinion doesn't really matter, if you don't care enough to back it up.
Cheeseman1000 Posted - 02/24/2004 : 15:10:35
quote:
Despite appearances to the contrary, I really dislike these diatribes and running debates

Says he who has just written the longest post in ages ranting about the subject.


"I joined the Cult Of Boni/Get Off My Trolley!"
Homers_pet_monkey Posted - 02/24/2004 : 15:08:32
(Insert farting noise here)

Hansel and Gretel have formed a band, .....And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Breadcrumbs!!!
Erebus Posted - 02/24/2004 : 11:38:12
quote:
Originally posted by floop

quote:
Originally posted by Erebus
We would do better to stay in touch with the actualities of nature, and pay fair prices in blood, sweat, and tears, than we will by attempting to shield ourselves. Things die. Squirrels. Babies. We should embrace that.



i'm curious what you're doing, personally, to stay more in touch with the actualities of nature.. or what you suggest people do (other than accepting that things die)..

the advancement of civiliation has had many deleterious effects, but it's also enriched human life. personally, i'm glad we have the kind of medicine and health care we have in the 21st century because, well, i'd rather live longer as opposed to shorter. dying of chicken pox at age 16 doesn't sound too hip to me.

i'm all for embracing the idea of death, and accepting the cycle of life etc.. but does that mean we should stop taking care of ourselves and go out of our way to get into some bloody hand-to-hand combat?

Fair question. As for myself, I'm not doing squat. Life is just something that matter does. But life does entail capacities for pleasure and pain so I live to optimize the balance. However, I suggest to those who maintain that there is more to life that they vote to adopt social policies which will force a more realistic relationship with nature. Humans use intelligence to control their vulnerability to consequences of decisions. If, rather, we constrained ourselves to governmental policies that resulted in more immediate feedback for behavior, we would be better off in the long run (assuming it actually means anything to use such terms as "better"). Examples, in brief: Government should not be involved in social welfare, education, health care, etc. If couples have more children then they can support, they should face the consequences. If a single parent, admittedly most often the mother, is stranded with children, govt should not dictate that the “deadbeat dad” should pay child support/alimony. The mother made a poor choice of mates. Let that choice play out. Let the 12 year olds of the community see how serious this game of life is. Let those who made the mistake pay for it, if only in the form of the suffering of their children (their DNA), growing up under deprived conditions. (Marriage should be treated as contractual arrangement. People should be able to printout a five page generic contract which spells out responsibilities in the event of divorce or abandonment. If dispute ensues, take it to court on the basis of breach of contract, but the govt should make no blanket laws dictating how much party A should pay to party B.) Make school attendance voluntary, and fund ALL schools from user fees. Pay as you go for everything, especially education and health care. If the student screws up, throw him out. Let him grow up as a street urchin, into a criminal, and deal with him as criminal, again without spending any public money on his imprisonment. Or let him mend his ways and attempt to get back into school, having seen the better way. But most of all, let there be immediate consequences for decisions, poor and good. Extend these principles of freedom, responsiblity, and proportionality into every aspect of human existence. All of this is not to say that private charities cannot exist. Or that groups cannot privately and voluntarily pool their resources for common ends and services.

Of course this sounds cruel by the lights of today, but I would maintain that is mostly because we have allowed things to get so far out shape. If such measures had been implemented long ago the present day would be much kinder than it is. We would exist in a state of moderation with the actualities of nature, to include human nature. But we all know none of what I propose has a snowflake's chance of being adopted. No, we'll continue on our way to the best of our ability, either eventually taking it so far that the whole structure collapses into, ironically, a condition much like that I recommend, or more likely, and pessimistically, gradually subsiding into the society glimpsed in A Clockwork Orange. Can't say we don't deserve it.

Anyway, floop, it’s not so much that I would prescribe specific behaviors as it is that I would suggest society make certain global changes of moral philosophy and applications thereof, and then the changes of the human relation to nature would ensue. I suggest that such changes would be conducive to richer and more authentic lives (if one believes such distinctions are possible). I for one know that I would soon disappear under the very regime I champion, but that’s OK. Life is not worth so much that I’d be willing to struggle for it.

Despite appearances to the contrary, I really dislike these diatribes and running debates. They require too much work. I’d prefer to simply snipe from distant trees and hills, at targets of opportunity. Guess one needs more than snipers to fight a war. But by writing a few quick and dirty paragraphs I open myself to countless valid objections which I really would prefer not do deal with. It all seems so pointless. How often is anyone actually convinced by any of this? Sure, it can be fun, but I really only enjoy the sniping. After all, sniping’s so clinical; no need for an up-close experience of the bloody realities on the receiving end.
Homers_pet_monkey Posted - 02/24/2004 : 10:36:56
As long as Brad is our leader!!!

Hansel and Gretel have formed a band, .....And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Breadcrumbs!!!
Adnan_le_Terrible Posted - 02/24/2004 : 07:34:17
We should start a fight club in order to keep ourselves in touch with mother nature. I warn you : I only fight against girls!



Have some wine, please, don't run away.
floop Posted - 02/24/2004 : 07:25:51
quote:
Originally posted by Erebus
We would do better to stay in touch with the actualities of nature, and pay fair prices in blood, sweat, and tears, than we will by attempting to shield ourselves. Things die. Squirrels. Babies. We should embrace that.



i'm curious what you're doing, personally, to stay more in touch with the actualities of nature.. or what you suggest people do (other than accepting that things die)..

the advancement of civiliation has had many deleterious effects, but it's also enriched human life. personally, i'm glad we have the kind of medicine and health care we have in the 21st century because, well, i'd rather live longer as opposed to shorter. dying of chicken pox at age 16 doesn't sound too hip to me.

i'm all for embracing the idea of death, and accepting the cycle of life etc.. but does that mean we should stop taking care of ourselves and go out of our way to get into some bloody hand-to-hand combat?
Dave Noisy Posted - 02/24/2004 : 00:27:12
Yes, everyone is going to die, but that is no excuse or justification for a lacky of sympathy or empathy, and doing anything else really does make us less 'human'.

I don't know if i'm more saddened by the creature who was run over, or the reactions that people have to it...


Join the Cult of the Flying Pigxies - I'm A Believer!
ramona Posted - 02/23/2004 : 16:36:04
Okay. Since you quoted me, I thought it was. Never mind.

**************************************************
"Music does not drag me down. Music lifts me up." - Frank Black
Adnan_le_Terrible Posted - 02/23/2004 : 15:14:07
quote:
Originally posted by ramona

Oy.

I think you boys might have taken my "this thread is horrifying me" statement as a specific response to something you said - it wasn't. I'm not saying I find the death of people any more or less horrifying or that I don't understand that things die. All I meant was, animal getting squished by car = sad.

I think my statement must have thudded down on you guys somehow, but I was really just being general/breezy/universal.

I PERSONALLY find accidental animal death (and any death really) upsetting. I know it happens, but I think it can be sad, especially when the person who ran the animal over is sad about it. That's all.

**************************************************
"Music does not drag me down. Music lifts me up." - Frank Black



My comment wasn't aimed at you in particular, really. As I already said, I think I would have exactly the same reaction as you.



Have some wine, please, don't run away.
Homers_pet_monkey Posted - 02/23/2004 : 14:39:43
quote:
Originally posted by Erebus

quote:
Originally posted by floop

quote:
Originally posted by Erebus
And to think that some people actually believe humanity is progressing relative to some sound measure.



i'm not sure what you mean by this sentence.

floop, perhaps my post above addresses this. I see much of what is characterized as "progress" in medicine, social policy, education, morality, etc. as regression into a condition of delusion.



Interesting theory, please go on.

Hansel and Gretel have formed a band, .....And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Breadcrumbs!!!
ramona Posted - 02/23/2004 : 14:28:04
quote:
Originally posted by Erebus

Things die. Squirrels. Babies. We should embrace that.



Oh, and this is never going to happen. Maybe it is my own personal experience with death, but while I understand everything dies, I will never embrace that. Ever.

**************************************************
"Music does not drag me down. Music lifts me up." - Frank Black
ramona Posted - 02/23/2004 : 14:25:42
Oy.

I think you boys might have taken my "this thread is horrifying me" statement as a specific response to something you said - it wasn't. I'm not saying I find the death of people any more or less horrifying or that I don't understand that things die. All I meant was, animal getting squished by car = sad.

I think my statement must have thudded down on you guys somehow, but I was really just being general/breezy/universal.

I PERSONALLY find accidental animal death (and any death really) upsetting. I know it happens, but I think it can be sad, especially when the person who ran the animal over is sad about it. That's all.

**************************************************
"Music does not drag me down. Music lifts me up." - Frank Black
Erebus Posted - 02/23/2004 : 14:18:14
quote:
Originally posted by floop

quote:
Originally posted by Erebus
And to think that some people actually believe humanity is progressing relative to some sound measure.



i'm not sure what you mean by this sentence.

floop, perhaps my post above addresses this. I see much of what is characterized as "progress" in medicine, social policy, education, morality, etc. as regression into a condition of delusion.

-= Frank Black Forum =- © 2002-2020 Frank Black Fans, Inc. Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000