-= Frank Black Forum =-
-= Frank Black Forum =-
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Off Topic!
 General Chat
 President Obama

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
trobrianders Posted - 04/29/2009 : 03:59:07
A place to talk about day to day issues affecting Obama's presidency.

Like today for example, 100 days in, comes the news of Arlen Spector's defection. Are the pundits right? Will the combination of a Democratic White House, a Democratic House and a possible 60 seat philibuster proof Senate majority give Obama all the power he needs to get what he wants done? Is that a good thing? More liberals in the judiciary, for example, has got to be a good thing, right?

_______________
Ed is the hoo hoo
35   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
BLT Posted - 09/29/2013 : 14:37:01
Chalk one up for the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/us/nsa-examines-social-networks-of-us-citizens.html?smid=pl-share
trobrianders Posted - 09/07/2013 : 04:04:33
The plot thickens

_______________
Ed is the hoo hoo
pot Posted - 09/04/2013 : 07:26:25
lol I think the US and the UK lost all credibility it had years ago..

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23962304

quote:
Jordanian PM Abdullah Ensour: "It would be a very exact hit to the chemical weapons, and not hurt the civilians"


Oh sure, because announcing you might be intending to bomb a weapons site days/weeks before you actually go ahead and do it totally makes sense from a strategic point of view.

They are going to have to be precise, and they are going to need some serious explosives to burn off all the chemicals, and they are gong to need to be sure that the enemy hasn't scattered the chemical weapons around such that if there was a strike most of it wouldn't get burned off and instead released into the air.

It's ok, no need to worry, the US military know how to handle this situation.
trobrianders Posted - 09/04/2013 : 04:08:41
quote:
Originally posted by danjersey

As far as Syria goes, who should or shan't assert a moral authority? Oh morality authority, you old chestnut .

Yes that's a conundrum for those that construct it.

_______________
Ed is the hoo hoo
pot Posted - 09/03/2013 : 20:15:21
You mean Patrick?

Obama's argument here seems to be that if they don't 'stage' some form of military intervention, ie. blow some carefully calculated targets up and hope to fuck they don't kill or maim too many civilians, or cause a massive humanitarian disaster that would make Bhopal look like a bad fart, that this will give all tyrannical regimes the green light to just go around attacking their civilians with impunity, much like Israel for instance.

Of course there is the counter argument, on the other hand, if this was instead the work of terrorists trying to stir shit up more and start a war, it plays right into their hands and almost encourages them to keep doing it, so as to eventually throw the entire world into a holy war. It wont be America's fault if that ever happens though.

Not so smart now Rambozo.
danjersey Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:54:06
guess not. thought he made some comment on hitler swaye Trump and travolta
danjersey Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:42:31
Oh shit, Darwin's in the house
pot Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:40:33
quote:
Originally posted by danjersey

yes, quite right pot. Moral authority! Are the Scott's in?




Don't know, ask Donald Trump. He knows what's best for us.
darwin Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:38:14
This is from the guy that said, "internal law"?
danjersey Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:37:22
yes, quite right pot. Moral authority! Are the Scott's in?
pot Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:26:14
Don't you mean mortality authority?
danjersey Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:14:46
As far as Syria goes, who should or shan't assert a moral authority? Oh morality authority, you old chestnut .
danjersey Posted - 09/02/2013 : 22:05:25
It's funny looking back. Life has grown pretty sweet
pot Posted - 09/02/2013 : 15:03:16
I listened to a talk show on BBC radio 5 the other night, some American pundit trying to defend Vietnam by stating that napalm is not actually illegal under internal law, or defined as a weapon.

I'm intrigued by the silence from Bush and Blair on this situation.

Everyone else 'currently in power' evidently doesn't have a clue what the fuck to do right now.

Oh dear, it looks like we were wrong after all. Not acting makes us look weak. Better stage some form of military action, or else we might lose the next election.

I think this was terrorists who done this, the same ones that the west supported several months ago. It could be anybody, with any motive. yet somehow the US magically has evidence it was the Syrian government.
trobrianders Posted - 09/02/2013 : 07:48:25
Stroke of genius handing the Syria question to Congress, forcing the people to take ownership of the chemical weapons ban. He's super smart.

_______________
Ed is the hoo hoo
danjersey Posted - 10/16/2009 : 19:58:00
if your looking for cheap air fare to LA

please see the "ask floop a question" thread
darwin Posted - 10/16/2009 : 12:26:38
Who are you and do you have something informative to say?

PS If you had your money the stock market during the past 8 months, you wouldn't be worried about the price.
jackruby Posted - 10/16/2009 : 08:57:29
How much are tickets to la-la land these days, Darwin?
hammerhands Posted - 10/11/2009 : 10:18:51
I've had a couple of days to think about this,
that headline may be one of the more profoundly
amusing ever written.
hammerhands Posted - 10/11/2009 : 04:44:11
A headline yesterday said something like
"Conservatives Say Nobel Shows Bias".
trobrianders Posted - 10/11/2009 : 01:15:47
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mOEU87SBTU
Cynic you.

_______________
Ed is the hoo hoo
danjersey Posted - 10/09/2009 : 18:21:06
glad to hear ya
trobrianders Posted - 10/09/2009 : 18:14:29
As easy to think of it less as ringing endorsement of the current president and more like howling contempt for the last one.

Or not. Hard now to think of Obama's presidency without your sarcasm in residency.

_______________
Ed is the hoo hoo
danjersey Posted - 10/09/2009 : 17:36:18
I'm so happy for the President

What else can we give him? I've got... let me check here... well, my pockets are in a deep financial recovery recession that is currently less severe than originally expected

so...

i'll look around

Edit;

trobrianders, what happened to your post?

I'll gladly leave this topic for an honest post today.
coastline Posted - 10/01/2009 : 07:10:14
quote:
Originally posted by coastline

When exactly DID we stop respecting the presidency? Does it go back to Clinton? Nixon? Farther?


Please pardon me, for these my wrongs.


Thomas Friedman of The New York Times was kind enough to address my question in today's paper: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/opinion/30friedman.html?em


Please pardon me, for these my wrongs.
danjersey Posted - 09/26/2009 : 20:29:55
darwin, your politics contradict your appetite

quote:
Originally posted by darwin

Why is cannibalism so beyond reason? Meat is meat. It's not unusual.

darwin Posted - 09/26/2009 : 04:10:10
quote:
Originally posted by danjersey

quote:
Originally posted by darwin

Basically, a lot of idiots "want the nigger dead". How could they ever respect a nigger?





Your point?
danjersey Posted - 09/25/2009 : 22:09:14
quote:
Originally posted by darwin

Basically, a lot of idiots "want the nigger dead". How could they ever respect a nigger?

darwin Posted - 09/25/2009 : 17:52:38
quote:
Originally posted by danjersey


I'm not suggesting that we deny that racism exists, I am however demanding that it not be used as a shield to protect the Obama Administration's policies.





Colbert with the rebuttal.

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/250386/september-24-2009/the-word---blackwashing
trobrianders Posted - 09/18/2009 : 08:37:21
Phut... pht... pt...

_______________
Ed is the hoo hoo
BLT Posted - 09/18/2009 : 07:21:43
quote:
Originally posted by Jose Jones

if Obama was 100% black, i'd be pissed. but he's only half black, so i'm just a little peeved.



I'm still waiting for the Thai folks to rise up and take pride in Tiger Woods.
Jose Jones Posted - 09/18/2009 : 06:42:17
if Obama was 100% black, i'd be pissed. but he's only half black, so i'm just a little peeved.

-----------------------
they were the heroes of old, men of renown.
Ziggy Posted - 09/18/2009 : 00:58:36
The Administration isn't using the term at all. Carter was quoted out of context, and made a valid point, although I think it was ill judged.
darwin Posted - 09/17/2009 : 19:05:35
And the Republicans can start criticizing Obama's proposed policies rather than repeatedly making racist attacks on him. Or at least the mainstream Republicans can publicly renounce the racist campaign against Obama that has been going on for the past 6 or so months.
danjersey Posted - 09/17/2009 : 18:09:42
quote:
Originally posted by darwin

Yes, I must check myself and my obsession with people not being prejudged because of their race.



Great!

quote:
Originally posted by darwin
I'll try to follow your prescription that racism won't exist if we deny its existence.



I'm not suggesting that we deny that racism exists, I am however demanding that it not be used as a shield to protect the Obama Administration's policies.


-= Frank Black Forum =- © 2002-2020 Frank Black Fans, Inc. Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000