quote:

---

Originally posted by Scarla O


Srisaket this discussion clearly could go on forever - it doesn't sound to me like I'm going to change your mind about the assassination and vice versa i think the same goes for me at the moment...thanks for the chat though :)

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Srisaket

[quote]Originally posted by The King Of Karaoke

It's been determined oswald could not have made the shots as described using the gun he supposedly used.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/01/wkennedy101.xml

But your article also says that earlier tests prove he could have made the shots in time

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Carl

JFK assin is gay lol

---

quote:

---

Yes - and he calls into question the reliability of anybody else that
he hasn't got a decent answer to. Character assassination (if you'll excuse the pun) is standard intelligence practice! Funny how news that Charlie Sheen downloaded pornography became public as soon as he started talking about 9/11. Funny how various academics have been tarred with the anti-semitism brush when they do the very same...

There are endless more examples.

Check out the article 'Twenty Five Ways To Suppress The Truth'...http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Scarla O

Point-by-point to Srisaket's post:

"However, the evidence of the fourth shot was based on acoustic evidence later proven to be erroneous"

Some people have claimed the fourth shot erroneous - however given that at least four bullets were found at the crime scene i think it reasonable to assume at least four shors were fired. One bullet to JFK's neck, one to the head, one clipping the side of the car and another grazing a police officer at the curb further along the road.

The head wound was described by the president's coroner as having come from the front and to the right - inconsistent with a shot from the book depository - afterwards they changed the results of the autopsy to indicate that the front right was in actual fact an exit wound! The trajectory of debris from the president's head clearly indicates the direction of the blow.

‘Mark Lane defended journalist Victor Marchetti's JFK assassination article in a libel court case in the early 80s at which various members of the CIA were called to witness and at which the jury came to the conclusion that E Howard Hunt - a CIA contract - was also involved in the assassination. I think you are referring to a libel case in Miami. E Howard Hunt was found guilty of ‘malice’ in the context of a libel conviction, not that he was involved in the assassination of JFK."

Yes it was a libel case which was being defended on the basis that the original newspaper article was correct - ie, that he was involved in the assassination of JFK. That withstanding, the various depositions given by senior CIA offiers produced information previously not known (Oswald having visited the Russian Embassy in Mexico for example).

‘So much of the evidence regarding Oswald had been tampered with - regardless of his culpability he didn't stand a snowball in hell's chance of a fair trial and the very fact that you state with such certainty that he was the killer just goes to prove the same.’
You might want to take a look at this link to a JFK assassination website regarding the subject of bogus evidence; http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bogus.htm. "

Of course i've been there - it's an interesting site but that's not the last word on it. In McAdams' opinion, anyone who defends the conspiracy position is a "conspiracy buff." McAdams frequently refers to those who reject the lone-gunman theory as "buffs." McAdams even applies this label to experts who speak about aspects of the assassination that involve their field of expertise.

For example, when McAdams learned that a professor of neuroscience at a Canadian university rejected the lone-gunman view that Kennedy's backward head snap was the result of a neuromuscular reaction, he opined that the professor was either a "buff" or had been spoon fed erroneous information by a critic of the lone-gunman theory.

"You will also see that Mark Lane’s name is mentioned and his reliability as a proponent of JFK assassination theories is also called into question."

Yes - and he calls into question the reliability of anybody else that
he hasn't got a decent answer to. Character assassination (if you'll excuse the pun) is standard intelligence practice! Funny how news that Charlie Sheen downloaded pornography became public as soon as he started talking about 9/11. Funny how various academics have been tarred with the anti-semitism brush when they do the very same...

There are endless more examples.

Check out the article 'Twenty Five Ways To Suppress The Truth'...http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by kathryn

It damned well should, knowing how big a boner KOK's had for her all these years.

---

the cure make me want to die, but in a good way -- mr.biscuitdoughhead

---

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by The King Of Karaoke

Deathbed Confession of E. Howard Hunt http://youtube.com/watch?v=fHZl91gN63g

Okay MKULTRA from Apocalypto thread.

Sandoz isolated LSD from ergot. It made it's way into the publics hands because of the MKULTRA program. It was synthasized by other scientists from LSD recieved from the O.S.S. basically.

The mushrooms were given to the growers by the CIA to see if they can be cultivated in greenhouses. From the growers they made their way into the publics hands.

Soemthing like that.

Hence justification of the statement "Mushrooms and LSD became available to the public via the CIA because of their MKULTRA program".

Don't doubt it.

------------------
Network - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTN3s2iVKKI
Orwell 1984 - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5464625623984168940

---