| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Bedbug |
Posted - 06/06/2019 : 06:03:08
Does the existence of Pixies 2.0 result in cash in the pockets of Murph?
When they play songs she wrote?
When they play songs she collaborated on?
Any other legal loopholes she can find to generate some flow?
(Asking for a friend) |
| 6 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| anazgnos |
Posted - 08/18/2019 : 06:42:03
The question would be what the legal framework is for the Pixies partnership. It could be that Charles is sole owner and the other members are employees, or they could all be partners; Kim could still be a partner or she could have been bought out or relinquished shares when she quit. In the event she was still a partner she would potentially get some chunk of touring revenue if they had agreed on that. I have no idea what the Pixies legal/corporate structure is! |
| stuczuba |
Posted - 06/08/2019 : 22:47:52
Do bands get PRS $ for playing their own stuff? |
| Jamie |
Posted - 06/08/2019 : 07:23:36
I'm no expert on the music business, but I can't imagine a royalty is paid on live performances. |
| The Maharal |
Posted - 06/07/2019 : 09:54:21
It'd be cool if the Dinosaur Jr drummer got some money from new Pixies stuff.
Does Frank still live beside J Mascis? |
| Bedbug |
Posted - 06/06/2019 : 08:22:08
So maybe she's rooting for them to play Gigantic as much as possible. |
| jake3 |
Posted - 06/06/2019 : 06:38:29
When they perform songs she has writing credits on I'd imagine so, yes. |
